My Takeaways From Howard Stern Comes Again

By Mike Maddaloni on Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 01:13 PM with 0 comments

photo of the back cover of Howard Stern Comes Again

When I got a copy of the book Howard Stern Comes Again for my birthday from my family last year, I was grateful but indifferent. Where I have always had respect for Stern’s accomplishments in radio and media, I was never a fan of his style. As I read his past 2 books, and was curious as to what this one was about, I dove into it. And I am glad I did.

This third book of Stern’s is a collection of segments from celebrity interviews he has done on his radio and satellite radio shows over the years, many of them in the last decade. I emphasize the time period for a reason, which will be a nice segue to my takeaways from this book.

Howard Stern has changed – The introduction to the book is 19 pages, which is the longest I have ever seen for an introduction. However it is necessary to paint the picture of the change in Stern’s life, from a health scare to going into psychotherapy. This is reflective in the more recent interviews in the book, where they are less sex-focused and less reflective of his narcissism and are now more insightful, both in the questions he asked and the responses of the celebrities he is interviewing.

Being real can be entertaining too – When I say real I don’t mean “reality” as in the faux-reality shows on TV like Survivor, but real as in conversation that appears on the surface as honest and, and as a result, real. Whether the celebrity responses were scripted ahead of time, who knows. But as I read through the interviews I actually enjoyed them, and that’s coming from someone who isn’t into celebrity interviews.

There’s sex talk too – It wouldn’t be Howard Stern if there was no talk about sex at all. But it’s not like I recall from hearing him in the past where he would open with questions like, “so what is it like to have sex with you?” This was a large part of my lack of interest in listening to him – it’s was raw for no reason other than being raw, and to me not entertaining. Then again, I have seen articles written about how Stern has gotten “soft” as he is now in his 60’s, so others are not a fan of his newer style as well.

If you are into celebrity interviews or just want some mind-candy, Howard Stern Comes Again is a book for you. It is a long book – over 550 pages and formatted in a multi-column format, and took much longer than I would have thought to read. If you’re not sure about whether to dive-in to the full book, the introduction alone is worth the read.

As I give away all books I read, this one is going to a great friend in Florida who is a devoted Howard Stern fan. Though he probably heard each and every one of these interviews, I am sure he will enjoy reading them as well.


This is from The Hot Iron, a journal on business and technology by Mike Maddaloni.


Did you enjoy this? Subscribe to The Hot Iron by RSS/XML feed or Read by Email

Book Take-Aways • (0) CommentsPermalink

My Takeaways From What Happened

By Mike Maddaloni on Thursday, October 31, 2019 at 07:03 PM with 0 comments

photo of the back cover of What Happened

When Hillary Clinton came out with her book What Happened less than a year after losing the 2016 US Presidential election, I was on the fence as to if I wanted to read it.

Where I was interested in hearing her own story directly through her own lens and not through that of the media, I was also hoping this wouldn’t simply be a book of excuses for why she lost. Then I got the book for Christmas that year, and it went on the shelf awaiting to be read. Somehow other books piqued my interest more, but as the Special Counsel was appointed the investigation into President Trump and the White House began, it made sense to me to read What Happened.

Shortly into the 500 plus pages of the book I formed my takeaways from it, only to be reinforced as I turned from chapter to chapter.

All of what happened is in there – This is something I was hoping for –all of the reasons for why she won the popular vote but lost the Electoral College. Many times she brought up the email scandal and then FBI Director Comey as a primary reason. But among the pages she did admit that she should have gone to states like Wisconsin and Michigan, and even one line was in there that some people may not like her. As far as I am concerned, the book lived up to its title.

Insight into behind-the-scenes of the campaign – I have only been involved intensely with a political campaign and it was many years ago. There is a certain momentum and buzz about it, and many characters and scenarios as well. The story of Clinton’s 2016 campaign is told well here, in a voice and cadence that sounds like her own. My guess is some of this was written during the campaign, with some editing for how the results turned out.

Hillary Clinton will be the 2020 Democratic Nominee for President of the United States – She wanted to be President and I feel she still wants to be. Will she win? We’ll see.

What Happened was a good read, and that is coming from a non-partisan. Those who are strictly partisan will either love or loathe is book, depending on what “side” they are on. As I give away all copies of this book, I decided to leave it at a Little Free Library at a local storage facility where I have my extra stuff stored away. There have been some interesting titles there, and I may take one to replace this one on my shelf.


This is from The Hot Iron, a journal on business and technology by Mike Maddaloni.


Did you enjoy this? Subscribe to The Hot Iron by RSS/XML feed or Read by Email

Book Take-Aways • (0) CommentsPermalink

My Takeaways From The Mueller Report

By Mike Maddaloni on Sunday, September 22, 2019 at 08:01 PM with 0 comments

photo of the back cover of The Mueller Report

When the long-awaited report on Russian collusion in the 2016 election and obstruction of justice by the Trump administration, better known as The Mueller Report, came out, I was eager to read it. I had enough of the media and political spinning and wanted the information from the source, the Special Counsel’s office lead by former FBI Director Robert Mueller.

When I downloaded the PDF report from the Department of Justice’s Web site moments after its release, I was a little overwhelmed - it was over 400 pages, and I’d have to print it to read, as I certainly wasn’t going to read it on my phone or computer. Staring at the redactions that permeated the pages as I scrolled through it, I thought to myself there had to be a better way to read this.

That lightbulb over my head led me to Amazon, and to my wonderment I saw a couple of versions of said report, which just came out for pre-order. In one click I had added myself to a queue of unknown quantities of people who wanted to read the report the old-fashioned way.

The book, The Mueller Report, The Final Report of the Special Counsel into Donald Trump, Russia and Collusion, arrived a few weeks later, just in time for a work trip. But as I should have anticipated, this was no quick read - written by lawyers, why would it be? Plus I spent as much time reading it on flights as I did talking with people sitting around me, wondering about it as much as I was, so it took even longer.

Eventually I finished the 472 pages of the book, which was longer than the report as it included extra materials, such as the powers of the Special Counsel. The report itself was shorter than the original for instead of showing 33 redacted physical lines, for example, it just mentioned 33 lines were not included. My takeaways were mostly on the content with a little from the report itself.

Details on what was being called hacking – As someone who works in Web technology and social media, it was not enough for me to just hear there was “hacking,” for I wanted all the details of what was being called that. What was in the report satisfied that to a certain extent, listing accounts on Twitter and Facebook and what was posted and by whom. Where I wouldn’t necessarily call it hacking, I do believe there was a deliberate attempt to influence people. However as no analytics were presented with the account activity, it is open as to its effectiveness.

Michael Cohen was Executive Vice President of Trump Organization – In any press mention of Donald Trump’s personal attorney I ever heard, I never heard of his title in Trump’s business. I heard he was a personal lawyer, fixer, handler, bodyman and various other labels that were slang not to compliment him. Granted you can give anyone any title in your own business, but if EVP was his title, why did the media never use it?

The infamous Trump Tower meeting yielded nothing – There was a lot of talk about a June 9, 2016 meeting among Donald Trump Jr., Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, then-campaign staff member (and later campaign chair) Paul Manafort and representatives from Russia. But after reading the testimonies from those in the meeting and what followed it, nothing came from it. Was their intent? That wasn’t even clear as it seemed like if there was to be some collusion, these weren’t the people capable of colluding!

Speaking of which, collusion wasn’t even considered – On pages 167 to 168 of the book it states, and I quote, “… this Office’s focus in resolving the question of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as described in federal law, not the commonly discussed term ‘collusion.’” So all this time - years - and all of everyone saying collusion, and the label wasn’t applicable? And none of the TV talking heads who are lawyers knew that?

Richard Pinedo was jailed for fake bank accounts as a result of the investigations – There were other charges against others, but I heard very little about it in the mainstream media. One was Richard Pineda, who was sentenced to prison for providing fake identification information to the Russians who were running the “hacking” social media campaigns. Presumably this information was used to eventually make payments to social media sites like Facebook and Twitter for promoted posts. Perhaps information on Pinedo was released to the media, and they chose not to promote it widely?

Trump didn’t “recall” a lot in his responses – The book includes the written responses to questions sent to President Trump in lieu of live testimony by the office of the Special Counsel. Most of them began with “I don’t remember” or “I don’t recall,” all of which did not come as a surprise to me.

I got lost a lot in the second part – The second part of the report was focused on obstruction by President Trump and his staff. Much of this presented a case, then a very long description of the applicable laws and case laws that applied to the case followed by a conclusion. This was a difficult read for me as it consisted of so many legal terms, as well the phrasing of legal descriptions doesn’t exactly follow any rules of prose. As I am not familiar with any of these laws and case laws referenced, there was little meaning to reading the middle of each case, and as much as I tried not to, on occasion I skipped to the end.

If you are interested in hearing something from the horses’ mouth, as the phrase goes, I would recommend reading The Mueller Report yourself. Again it is not a quick read, and not always an easy one, but everything is in there in its source that has been translated by the media for the general consumers.

As I give away every book I read, I will give this one to the first person who makes a comment to this blog post. Don’t post your address, as I will follow-up with you outside of this. Note I have moderation on comments, and they will not appear right away. This offer is open to anyone, anywhere in the world. Make sure to follow the comments to see if you are the lucky winner!


This is from The Hot Iron, a journal on business and technology by Mike Maddaloni.


Did you enjoy this? Subscribe to The Hot Iron by RSS/XML feed or Read by Email Book Take-AwaysStrategize • (0) CommentsPermalink

My Takeaways From How To Think Like Churchill

By Mike Maddaloni on Wednesday, September 04, 2019 at 06:39 PM with 0 comments

photo of the back cover of How to Think Like Churchill

Where I have always considered myself a history buff, I am by no means fully knowledgeable of all events in US and world history and their nuances. That being said, I am aware of most core events in US history, and of those abroad with a focus on the impacts here in America.

When I got a copy of How to Think Like Churchill as a gift from a relative, I was eager to read it. I was aware of Winston Churchill’s ascent to Prime Minister of the UK during at the time of World War II, his role immediately following the war and his love for cigars. But that was about it. My hope was this book would fill me in on the life and career of this pivotal world leader.

Fortunately this book lived up to my expectations, and then some. What went to and beyond my expectations were my takeaways from it.

I didn’t know about his earlier life – From being a soldier to a journalist to his early political offices, Winston Churchill lived a full life with a great breadth of activities. The majority of my knowledge of him begins with being UK’s Prime Minister following Neville Chamberlain and ends after World War II. This new knowledge of his upbringing, career and time in and out of office provides context to understanding who Churchill was and what he did.

Quotes and more quotes – I have known for years the quote, “If you’re going through hell, keep going” and that it was attributed to Churchill. After reading this book, which is sprinkled with his quotes throughout its pages, I learned many more of his famous sayings, as well as how he was able to sum up his thought process succinctly. Churchill would have done well today in the age of the sound bite and social media.

Soldiering On – To say Winston Churchill’s career bounced back from obscurity to be one the best known world leaders of the 20th century is an understatement. Personal loss, public defeat and challenges at home were just part of what plagued Churchill, but despite all of these he made a return unlike no other. The details of his challenges and his triumphs are nothing short of inspiring for anyone facing great odds.

How to Think Like Churchill is a small but mighty book at 203 pages. It’s larger than life subject made this an enjoyable read. The book is part of a series of “how to think” books on the likes of Steve Jobs and Nelson Mandela and is worth your pursuit whether you’re a fan of Churchill or other great personalities of history. As I give away all of the books I read, I left this one at the local coffee shop where I wrote these takeaways.


This is from The Hot Iron, a journal on business and technology by Mike Maddaloni.


Did you enjoy this? Subscribe to The Hot Iron by RSS/XML feed or Read by Email Book Take-AwaysDiversions • (0) CommentsPermalink

My Takeaways From Rereading The Design Of Everyday Things

By Mike Maddaloni on Friday, April 26, 2019 at 02:09 PM with 1 comments

photo of back cover of The Design of Everyday Things

Shouldn’t things just work?

While on vacation last summer, we rented a car and got upgraded to a large SUV, a model I never drove before. When I got in I took a quick look around, pushed the start button and drove off. It got dark and foggy as we drove to the distant destination and the windshield started fogging up. So I looked and felt around the steering column and dashboard for the wipers and defogger, unfortunately without any luck. Having no other option, I pulled to the side of the road that really had no shoulder – much to the dismay of traffic behind me – and found a lever directly behind another lever on the steering column, and after a few twists activated the wipers and defogger and was able to see the rest of the way.

Has something like this happened to you? Have you tried to use something you think should just work, or find something on an item where you’d least expect it? This time it was a car, other times it’s a lamp, or even computer software. This thinking and frustration is the premise of the book The Design of Everyday Things by Donald Norman, an expert on usability.

Going thru some books I already read and still held onto, I decided to reread this classic book, and it brought back memories of the first time I read it; good memories from the material I learned in the book and bad ones because there’s still a lot of design issues out there that cause for poor user experiences. Those memories are structured into the following takeaways.

It’s not just us – When we have a poor user experience or trouble doing something, we tend to beat on ourselves. I have seen this a lot with computers, as some people are expecting a computer to just “do” something, and they often need more information, like a manual or someone to show them how, in order to complete a task. This happens to myself with software, Web sites or apps as well; I, someone who builds these, am expecting something or a certain outcome, and am not finding it that way. I chalk these up to bad design, where the one who created it never took into consideration how people would use it, or got feedback from observing people using it.

Internal vs. External Knowledge – This concept refers to internal knowledge as “in the head” as compared to external as “in the world” knowledge. Examples include knowing how to do something vs. having a manual or instructions on how to do it, to remembering a birthday to getting a calendar alert to remind you it is someone’s birthday. We bring internal knowledge into every situation, but sometimes need external knowledge to reinforce or remind or simply tell us how to do whatever it is.

There is good design out there – Where the book highlights a lot of bad design, it does talk about good design. I often reflect on an experience – e.g. driving a different car or going to a new place – and think of the user experience. I will smile if it was a good experience and complain if it wasn’t.

Bad design is an ongoing concern –The edition of The Design of Everyday Things I read was republished in 2002, and its original version came out in 1988 (note a later version was revised and expanded in 2013). Now 17 years after the republish, where a reader may get a chuckle when seeing some of the “dated” examples of items with poor design (for example, the telephone pictured), the principles written by Norman years ago are still very relevant today.

The Design of Everyday Things is not solely about computers or technology. I say this as perhaps my examples or even my background may imply this, plus the fact Donald Norman is a co-founder of Nielsen Norman Group - a firm that works in design and user experience, a lot of it centered on technology but not exclusively. I recommend this to any psychologist or student of the mind to anyone who gets easily frustrated when things don’t just work for them, or both. As I pass along all books, I am finally offloading this one, giving it to someone whom I met at a networking event a while back and to whom I offered the book… whether she has the internal knowledge of this, or needs this post as external knowledge, I will soon find out.


This is from The Hot Iron, a journal on business and technology by Mike Maddaloni.


Did you enjoy this? Subscribe to The Hot Iron by RSS/XML feed or Read by Email Book Take-AwaysWeb Design • (1) CommentsPermalink


Page 9 of 23 pages ‹ First  < 7 8 9 10 11 >  Last ›